Head to head

Concept No. 5 vs Leopard 1

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Concept No. 5
Concept No. 5
Tier X Medium Tank Great Britain
vs
Second tank
Leopard 1
Leopard 1
Tier X Medium Tank Germany

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
4 : 3

Overall picture

Concept No. 5 leads in 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
Concept No. 5 Leopard 1

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

54.64 %

Win rate

0.2 % difference

54.75 %
2,325

Avg. WN8

5.3 % difference

2,454
22,541

Battles

87.1 % difference

174,480

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

1,941

Avg. damage

2.5 % difference

1,892
0.98

Avg. kills

2.1 % difference

0.96
1.50

Avg. spotted

26.7 % difference

1.10
0.71

Avg. defence

4.2 % difference

0.74
49.87 %

Exp. win rate

1.9 % difference

48.92 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Concept No. 5 3,203
Leopard 1 3,122
2 Marks
Concept No. 5 4,658
Leopard 1 4,541
3 Marks
Concept No. 5 6,017
Leopard 1 5,866

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Concept No. 5 Tier X
Win rate Rank 84 of 110

Better than 24 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 70 of 93

Better than 25 % of the tier

Leopard 1 Tier X
Win rate Rank 80 of 110

Better than 28 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 55 of 93

Better than 41 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Concept No. 5
Leopard 1

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Concept No. 5 data sheet Leopard 1 data sheet