Head to head

FCM 2C vs Type 91 Heavy

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
FCM 2C
FCM 2C
Tier III Heavy Tank France
vs
Second tank
Type 91 Heavy
Type 91 Heavy
Tier III Heavy Tank Japan

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
1 : 0

Overall picture

FCM 2C leads in 1 of 1 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

At least one of the two vehicles has no WN8 expected values. Without them no strength profile can be drawn.

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

53.85 %

Win rate

8.6 % difference

49.22 %
no data

Avg. WN8

610
208

Battles

90.7 % difference

2,235

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

no data

Avg. damage

373
no data

Avg. kills

1.17
no data

Avg. spotted

0.72
no data

Avg. defence

1.05
no data

Exp. win rate

53.91 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
FCM 2C
Type 91 Heavy 616
2 Marks
FCM 2C
Type 91 Heavy 896
3 Marks
FCM 2C
Type 91 Heavy 1,157

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

FCM 2C Tier III
Win rate Rank 23 of 64

Better than 65 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 no data
Type 91 Heavy Tier III
Win rate Rank 58 of 64

Better than 10 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 56 of 61

Better than 8 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

FCM 2C

No profile with enough battles on this vehicle stored yet.

Type 91 Heavy

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

FCM 2C data sheet Type 91 Heavy data sheet