FV4025 Contriver vs KR-1
Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.
Overall picture
FV4025 Contriver leads in 1 of 1 comparable metrics.
Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.
Strength profile
Five axes side by side
Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.
At least one of the two vehicles has no WN8 expected values. Without them no strength profile can be drawn.
Measured stats
Measured, not estimated
Win rate
2.6 % difference
Avg. WN8
Battles
73.0 % difference
Expected values per battle
XVM reference
Avg. damage
Avg. kills
Avg. spotted
Avg. defence
Exp. win rate
Marks of Excellence
Lower is better
The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.
No WN8 data available.
Standing within the tier
Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier
Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.
Better than 83 % of the tier
Better than 61 % of the tier
More duels
Same tier, same class
The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.