Head to head

K-91 Version II vs Leopard Prototyp A

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
K-91 Version II
K-91 Version II
Tier IX Medium Tank Soviet Union
vs
Second tank
Leopard Prototyp A
Leopard Prototyp A
Tier IX Medium Tank Germany

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
4 : 3

Overall picture

K-91 Version II leads in 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
K-91 Version II Leopard Prototyp A

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

61.79 %

Win rate

11.9 % difference

54.43 %
2,502

Avg. WN8

10.9 % difference

2,229
759

Battles

99.2 % difference

97,032

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

1,511

Avg. damage

5.3 % difference

1,595
0.92

Avg. kills

2.2 % difference

0.95
1.38

Avg. spotted

21.8 % difference

1.08
0.51

Avg. defence

37.5 % difference

0.82
52.86 %

Exp. win rate

5.0 % difference

50.19 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
K-91 Version II 2,493
Leopard Prototyp A 2,632
2 Marks
K-91 Version II 3,626
Leopard Prototyp A 3,828
3 Marks
K-91 Version II 4,683
Leopard Prototyp A 4,944

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

K-91 Version II Tier IX
Win rate Rank 1 of 129

Better than 100 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 11 of 99

Better than 90 % of the tier

Leopard Prototyp A Tier IX
Win rate Rank 70 of 129

Better than 46 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 33 of 99

Better than 67 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

K-91 Version II
Leopard Prototyp A

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

K-91 Version II data sheet Leopard Prototyp A data sheet