Head to head

Kpz. Erich Konzept I vs Leopard Prototyp A

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Kpz. Erich Konzept I
Kpz. Erich Konzept I
Tier IX Medium Tank Germany
vs
Second tank
Leopard Prototyp A
Leopard Prototyp A
Tier IX Medium Tank Germany

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
1 : 0

Overall picture

Kpz. Erich Konzept I leads in 1 of 1 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

At least one of the two vehicles has no WN8 expected values. Without them no strength profile can be drawn.

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

56.20 %

Win rate

3.1 % difference

54.43 %
no data

Avg. WN8

2,229
14,284

Battles

85.3 % difference

97,032

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

no data

Avg. damage

1,595
no data

Avg. kills

0.95
no data

Avg. spotted

1.08
no data

Avg. defence

0.82
no data

Exp. win rate

50.19 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Kpz. Erich Konzept I
Leopard Prototyp A 2,632
2 Marks
Kpz. Erich Konzept I
Leopard Prototyp A 3,828
3 Marks
Kpz. Erich Konzept I
Leopard Prototyp A 4,944

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Kpz. Erich Konzept I Tier IX
Win rate Rank 31 of 129

Better than 77 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 no data
Leopard Prototyp A Tier IX
Win rate Rank 70 of 129

Better than 46 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 33 of 99

Better than 67 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Kpz. Erich Konzept I

No profile with enough battles on this vehicle stored yet.

Leopard Prototyp A

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Kpz. Erich Konzept I data sheet Leopard Prototyp A data sheet