Head to head

Marder II vs M3G FT

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Marder II
Marder II
Tier III Tank Destroyer Germany
vs
Second tank
M3G FT
M3G FT
Tier III Tank Destroyer China

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
4 : 2

Overall picture

Marder II leads in 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
Marder II M3G FT

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

52.79 %

Win rate

3.2 % difference

51.11 %
934

Avg. WN8

tied

934
19,553

Battles

95.6 % difference

853

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

392

Avg. damage

7.5 % difference

424
1.37

Avg. kills

4.9 % difference

1.45
0.90

Avg. spotted

35.7 % difference

0.58
1.58

Avg. defence

12.3 % difference

1.38
58.40 %

Exp. win rate

5.4 % difference

55.23 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Marder II 647
M3G FT 700
2 Marks
Marder II 942
M3G FT 1,018
3 Marks
Marder II 1,216
M3G FT 1,315

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Marder II Tier III
Win rate Rank 27 of 64

Better than 59 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 36 of 61

Better than 42 % of the tier

M3G FT Tier III
Win rate Rank 41 of 64

Better than 37 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 36 of 61

Better than 42 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Marder II
M3G FT

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Marder II data sheet M3G FT data sheet