Head to head

Progetto M35 mod. 46 vs Lansen C

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Progetto M35 mod. 46
Progetto M35 mod. 46
Tier VIII Medium Tank Italy
vs
Second tank
Lansen C
Lansen C
Tier VIII Medium Tank Sweden

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
4 : 3

Overall picture

Progetto M35 mod. 46 leads in 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
Progetto M35 mod. 46 Lansen C

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

55.49 %

Win rate

0.8 % difference

55.92 %
2,462

Avg. WN8

2.2 % difference

2,517
177,550

Battles

87.0 % difference

23,107

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

1,293

Avg. damage

4.3 % difference

1,237
0.97

Avg. kills

8.7 % difference

0.89
1.30

Avg. spotted

3.8 % difference

1.25
0.74

Avg. defence

0.1 % difference

0.74
50.64 %

Exp. win rate

0.5 % difference

50.91 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Progetto M35 mod. 46 2,133
Lansen C 2,041
2 Marks
Progetto M35 mod. 46 3,102
Lansen C 2,969
3 Marks
Progetto M35 mod. 46 4,007
Lansen C 3,835

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Progetto M35 mod. 46 Tier VIII
Win rate Rank 89 of 228

Better than 61 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 42 of 200

Better than 79 % of the tier

Lansen C Tier VIII
Win rate Rank 75 of 228

Better than 67 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 33 of 200

Better than 84 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Progetto M35 mod. 46
Lansen C

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Progetto M35 mod. 46 data sheet Lansen C data sheet