Head to head

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C vs Lago M38

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C
Tier III Light Tank Germany
vs
Second tank
Lago M38
Lago M38
Tier III Light Tank Sweden

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
3 : 4

Overall picture

Lago M38 leads in 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C Lago M38

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

53.63 %

Win rate

8.4 % difference

49.11 %
1,230

Avg. WN8

23.1 % difference

1,600
39,843

Battles

98.4 % difference

621

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

267

Avg. damage

52.0 % difference

556
1.15

Avg. kills

15.9 % difference

1.37
2.62

Avg. spotted

51.9 % difference

1.26
1.41

Avg. defence

11.2 % difference

1.59
55.32 %

Exp. win rate

6.5 % difference

51.74 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C 440
Lago M38 918
2 Marks
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C 641
Lago M38 1,335
3 Marks
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C 827
Lago M38 1,725

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C Tier III
Win rate Rank 24 of 64

Better than 63 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 26 of 61

Better than 58 % of the tier

Lago M38 Tier III
Win rate Rank 59 of 64

Better than 8 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 11 of 61

Better than 83 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C
Lago M38

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C data sheet Lago M38 data sheet