Head to head

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C vs Type 98 Ke-Ni

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C
Tier III Light Tank Germany
vs
Second tank
Type 98 Ke-Ni
Type 98 Ke-Ni
Tier III Light Tank Japan

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
1 : 6

Overall picture

Type 98 Ke-Ni leads in 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C Type 98 Ke-Ni

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

53.63 %

Win rate

2.3 % difference

54.90 %
1,230

Avg. WN8

5.7 % difference

1,305
39,843

Battles

96.9 % difference

1,235

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

267

Avg. damage

10.2 % difference

297
1.15

Avg. kills

0.4 % difference

1.16
2.62

Avg. spotted

39.6 % difference

1.58
1.41

Avg. defence

8.4 % difference

1.54
55.32 %

Exp. win rate

2.5 % difference

56.73 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C 440
Type 98 Ke-Ni 490
2 Marks
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C 641
Type 98 Ke-Ni 713
3 Marks
Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C 827
Type 98 Ke-Ni 921

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C Tier III
Win rate Rank 24 of 64

Better than 63 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 26 of 61

Better than 58 % of the tier

Type 98 Ke-Ni Tier III
Win rate Rank 20 of 64

Better than 70 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 23 of 61

Better than 63 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C
Type 98 Ke-Ni

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. C data sheet Type 98 Ke-Ni data sheet