Head to head

Spähpanzer Ru 251 vs LPT-67 Šelma

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Spähpanzer Ru 251
Spähpanzer Ru 251
Tier IX Light Tank Germany
vs
Second tank
LPT-67 Šelma
LPT-67 Šelma
Tier IX Light Tank Czechoslovakia

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
4 : 3

Overall picture

Spähpanzer Ru 251 leads in 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
Spähpanzer Ru 251 LPT-67 Šelma

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

54.49 %

Win rate

4.3 % difference

52.15 %
2,175

Avg. WN8

11.0 % difference

1,936
63,625

Battles

88.2 % difference

7,482

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

960

Avg. damage

1.8 % difference

977
0.68

Avg. kills

4.1 % difference

0.71
2.70

Avg. spotted

23.2 % difference

2.08
0.74

Avg. defence

4.7 % difference

0.71
51.20 %

Exp. win rate

2.8 % difference

52.67 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Spähpanzer Ru 251 1,583
LPT-67 Šelma 1,613
2 Marks
Spähpanzer Ru 251 2,303
LPT-67 Šelma 2,346
3 Marks
Spähpanzer Ru 251 2,975
LPT-67 Šelma 3,030

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Spähpanzer Ru 251 Tier IX
Win rate Rank 66 of 129

Better than 49 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 41 of 99

Better than 59 % of the tier

LPT-67 Šelma Tier IX
Win rate Rank 115 of 129

Better than 11 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 70 of 99

Better than 30 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Spähpanzer Ru 251
LPT-67 Šelma

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Spähpanzer Ru 251 data sheet LPT-67 Šelma data sheet