Head to head

T-26G FT vs AT-1

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
T-26G FT
T-26G FT
Tier II Tank Destroyer China
vs
Second tank
AT-1
AT-1
Tier II Tank Destroyer Soviet Union

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
3 : 4

Overall picture

AT-1 leads in 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
T-26G FT AT-1

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

52.98 %

Win rate

5.4 % difference

50.10 %
827

Avg. WN8

18.7 % difference

672
168

Battles

96.0 % difference

4,206

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

348

Avg. damage

14.2 % difference

298
1.56

Avg. kills

4.7 % difference

1.63
0.42

Avg. spotted

3.0 % difference

0.43
1.42

Avg. defence

21.0 % difference

1.80
57.95 %

Exp. win rate

0.3 % difference

58.13 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
T-26G FT 574
AT-1 492
2 Marks
T-26G FT 835
AT-1 716
3 Marks
T-26G FT 1,079
AT-1 925

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

T-26G FT Tier II
Win rate Rank 22 of 51

Better than 58 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 35 of 51

Better than 32 % of the tier

AT-1 Tier II
Win rate Rank 43 of 51

Better than 16 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 44 of 51

Better than 14 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

T-26G FT

No profile with enough battles on this vehicle stored yet.

AT-1

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

T-26G FT data sheet AT-1 data sheet