Head to head

T67 vs Type 3 Ho-Ni III

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
T67
T67
Tier V Tank Destroyer USA
vs
Second tank
Type 3 Ho-Ni III
Type 3 Ho-Ni III
Tier V Tank Destroyer Japan

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
6 : 1

Overall picture

T67 leads in 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
T67 Type 3 Ho-Ni III

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

56.78 %

Win rate

10.1 % difference

51.06 %
2,187

Avg. WN8

18.0 % difference

1,793
120,866

Battles

97.8 % difference

2,640

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

592

Avg. damage

6.7 % difference

635
1.15

Avg. kills

17.6 % difference

0.94
1.36

Avg. spotted

63.5 % difference

0.50
1.40

Avg. defence

28.4 % difference

1.01
54.06 %

Exp. win rate

2.9 % difference

52.48 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
T67 978
Type 3 Ho-Ni III 1,047
2 Marks
T67 1,422
Type 3 Ho-Ni III 1,523
3 Marks
T67 1,837
Type 3 Ho-Ni III 1,968

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

T67 Tier V
Win rate Rank 19 of 87

Better than 79 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 11 of 81

Better than 88 % of the tier

Type 3 Ho-Ni III Tier V
Win rate Rank 80 of 87

Better than 8 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 39 of 81

Better than 53 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

T67
Type 3 Ho-Ni III

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

T67 data sheet Type 3 Ho-Ni III data sheet