Head to head

Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai vs M4A1 Sherman

Two vehicles side by side — expected values from the XVM reference, measured values from the stored profiles.

First tank
Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai
Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai
Tier V Medium Tank Japan
vs
Second tank
M4A1 Sherman
M4A1 Sherman
Tier V Medium Tank USA

Loading list…

No tank found

Loading list…

No tank found

Swap
2 : 5

Overall picture

M4A1 Sherman leads in 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Only mutually independent values are counted: win rate, average WN8 and the five expected values. Battle count measures popularity rather than strength, and the MoE thresholds are arithmetically the same figure as average damage — both stay out.

Strength profile

Five axes side by side

Each axis is scaled to the range of the tiers involved: the outer edge is the best value of the tier, the centre the weakest. The shape therefore shows where a vehicle stands among its peers — not merely which of the two numbers is larger.

Damage Kills Spotting Defence Win rate
Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai M4A1 Sherman

Measured stats

Measured, not estimated

53.18 %

Win rate

3.1 % difference

54.90 %
1,802

Avg. WN8

6.9 % difference

1,678
10,351

Battles

70.1 % difference

34,676

Expected values per battle

XVM reference

511

Avg. damage

0.5 % difference

514
0.94

Avg. kills

11.4 % difference

1.06
1.07

Avg. spotted

22.3 % difference

1.38
1.15

Avg. defence

10.2 % difference

1.03
53.05 %

Exp. win rate

3.2 % difference

54.79 %

Marks of Excellence

Lower is better

The bar shows the combined damage required for each mark of excellence. All six bars share one scale — the shorter one marks the vehicle on which the mark is easier to earn.

1 Mark
Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai 844
M4A1 Sherman 847
2 Marks
Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai 1,227
M4A1 Sherman 1,233
3 Marks
Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai 1,585
M4A1 Sherman 1,592

Approximation based on WN8 expected values — not an official Wargaming figure.

Standing within the tier

Percentile among all vehicles of the same tier

Both vehicles are measured against their own tier, not against each other. That keeps a cross-tier comparison readable: the percentage states which share of the vehicle’s own tier scores worse.

Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai Tier V
Win rate Rank 58 of 87

Better than 34 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 38 of 81

Better than 54 % of the tier

M4A1 Sherman Tier V
Win rate Rank 36 of 87

Better than 59 % of the tier

Avg. WN8 Rank 44 of 81

Better than 46 % of the tier

Best players in this duel

The three best stored profiles per vehicle

From the stored profiles, minimum 50 battles on this vehicle. Updated daily.

Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai
M4A1 Sherman

The advantage is highlighted in the colour of its side — for the MoE thresholds that is the lower value. Expected values are reference figures for the WN8 calculation, not vehicle statistics: they state what an average player achieves in this tank.

Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai data sheet M4A1 Sherman data sheet